4.2 Article

Effects of Serum-Free Culture at the Air-Liquid Interface in a Human Tissue-Engineered Skin Substitute

Journal

TISSUE ENGINEERING PART A
Volume 17, Issue 7-8, Pages 877-888

Publisher

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/ten.tea.2010.0256

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [MOP-86498, MOP-90283]
  2. Fonds de la Recherche en Sante du Quebec,'' Quebec, QC, Canada
  3. Faculte de Pharmacie, Universite Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Previous studies have reported that well-defined culture conditions can improve keratinocytes terminal differentiation and reproducibility. The aim of our study was to compare skin substitutes cultured in a complete medium with those cultured in a serum-free medium at the air-liquid interface to optimize the self-assembly method. Skin substitutes, cultured in a serum-free medium over 7, 14, and 21 days, were compared with others cultured in a complete medium (5% serum) over the complete culture period. Masson's Trichrome staining showed that the substitutes cultured in a serum-free medium generated a well-developed and differentiated epidermis. Immunolabeling analyses between the substitutes cultured without serum and those cultured in complete serum showed similar expression of epidermal differentiation markers, dermo-epidermal junction, and dermal extracellular matrix components. On the basis of our Attenuated Total Reflectance-Fourier Transform Infrared (ATR-FTIR) results, the skin substitutes cultured in serum-free condition over 21 days of culture at the air-liquid interface showed lower frequencies of the CH2 symmetric mode of vibrations, which means a better lipid organization of the stratum corneum. No significant difference in hydrocortisone penetration was observed between serum-free medium substitutes and the controls. Results demonstrate that the absence of serum does not compromise the characteristics of the skin substitutes observed in this study.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available