4.2 Article

Hypoxic Culture Maintains Self-Renewal and Enhances Embryoid Body Formation of Human Embryonic Stem Cells

Journal

TISSUE ENGINEERING PART A
Volume 16, Issue 9, Pages 2901-2913

Publisher

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/ten.tea.2009.0722

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Council of the Republic of China [NSC94-2314-B-002-199, NSC95-2314-B-002-037, NSC97-3111-B-002-002]
  2. Industrial Technology Research Institute (ITRI) [455-1]
  3. National Taiwan University Hospital [MG 237]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hypoxic environment is theoretically more physiological for the growth of human embryonic stem (hES) cells. It has been reported that hypoxic culture maintained better undifferentiation of hES cells, but the effects on differentiation are less well established. The hES cells were thus cultured and compared in hypoxia (2% oxygen [O-2]) and normoxia (21% O-2). The data showed that the undifferentiated state of hES cells was maintained more favorably in hypoxia during prolonged culture. Most tested genes belonging to FGF, TGF-beta/GMP, and Wnt signaling pathways were enriched in undifferentiated hES cells and downregulated upon differentiation, accompanied with differential expression of FGFR1, FGFR2, and FRAT2 between hypoxia and normoxia. Higher P-Smad2/3 level was identified in hypoxia, favoring the maintenance of hES cells in undifferentiation. Bisulfite sequencing showed similar imprinting status between different O-2 tensions at H19 differentially methylated region (DMR) and KvDMR loci. Embryoid body formation was enhanced in hypoxia accompanied with suppressed Sox17, Desmin, Gata4, Brachyury, and Cdx2 expression. We concluded that hypoxia improved self-renewal of hES cells through modulation of major signaling pathways and was also more efficient for differentiation to embryoid bodies, though they might present with suppressed expression of some lineage-specific genes across all the three embryonic germ layers and trophectoderm.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available