4.6 Article

Non-therapeutic anti-Xa levels in medical patients receiving anticoagulant therapy with enoxaparin

Journal

THROMBOSIS RESEARCH
Volume 132, Issue 4, Pages 433-436

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2013.08.017

Keywords

Drug monitoring; Enoxaparin; Factor Xa; Low-molecular-weight heparin

Funding

  1. Vicerrectoria de Investigacion, Universidad de Costa Rica

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: Anticoagulant activity of enoxaparin is not routinely monitored even when previous studies have shown a high pharmacological variability. The aim of this study is to determine the prevalence of non-therapeutic anti-Xa levels among medical patients using enoxaparin as anticoagulant therapy and to point out potential risk factors related to the risk of having a sub-therapeutic level. Materials and methods: Anti-Xa levels were measured in a cohort of sixty patients with medical indication for enoxaparin. Patients were categorized according to anti-Xa levels as follows: suboptimal anticoagulation (<0.5 IU/ml), optimal anticoagulation (between 0.5 and 1.2 IU/ml) or overanticoagulated (>1.2 IU/ml). Demographic and clinical variables and the use of concomitant medications were described for each group. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to assess the relationship between sub-optimal anticoagulation and potential predictive variables. A linear regression analysis was done to assess the relationship between anti-Xa activity, age, weight, body mass index, administered dose/weight and creatinine clearance. Results: The mean anti-Xa activity was 0.71 +/- 0.32 UI/ml. Thirty one percent of patients had anti-Xa levels out of the therapeutic range, most of them (twenty-eight percent of total population) with a sub-therapeutic level. None of the variables were associated with the risk of a sub-therapeutic anti-Xa level. Conclusion: Almost one third of patients receiving enoxaparin had anti-Xa levels out of the therapeutic range. We need more studies to determine the clinical relevance of these findings. (c) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available