4.6 Article

Elevated platelet angiostatin and circulating endothelial microfragments in idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension: A preliminary study

Journal

THROMBOSIS RESEARCH
Volume 125, Issue 1, Pages 53-60

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2009.04.005

Keywords

Platelets; Angiostatin; Endothelial microfragments; Idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension

Funding

  1. Canadian Institute of Health Research [MOP-57726]
  2. Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: Idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (IPAH) is characterized by pulmonary arteriolar narrowing and degeneration associated with in situ thrombosis. We hypothesized that microvascular endothelial injury and apoptosis may be an initiating mechanism in IPAH. Endothelial apoptosis generates endothelial microfragments (EMF), which can activate platelets. Platelets release both VEGF and angiostatin, which depending the balance can inhibit or induce endothelial apoptosis, respectively. Materials and Methods: We measured EMFs from blood of IPAH patients as index of endothelial cell apoptosis/injury and levels of pro- and anti-EC apoptotic factors found in platelets. EMFs and platelets in blood samples from control subjects and patients with IPAH were measured using a 4-color flow cytometry protocol, and platelet levels of VEGF and angiostatin were determined by ELISAs and immunoblotting. Results: Compared to controls, IPAH patients exhibited higher numbers of circulating EMFs and more activated/apoptotic platelets. IPAH patients also exhibited higher levels of platelet angiostatin; however, no significant difference was detected in platelet VEGF levels between the two groups. Conclusions: These results are consistent with an increase in EC dysfunction in patients with IPAH, possibly contributing to the progression of IPAH and its associated thrombosis. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available