4.6 Article

Association of V617F Jak2 mutation with the risk of thrombosis among patients with essential thrombocythaemia or idiopathic myelofibrosis: A systematic review

Journal

THROMBOSIS RESEARCH
Volume 124, Issue 4, Pages 409-417

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2009.02.004

Keywords

Essential thrombocythemia; Idiopathic myelofibrosis; V617F Jak-2; Thrombosis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: Many studies evaluated the association of V617F Jak-2 with the risk of thrombosis in patients with essential thrombocythaemia, but the results of these studies were inconsistent. Few studies evaluated the association of V617F Jak-2 mutation with the risk of thrombosis in patients with idiopathic myelofibrosis. Therefore, we performed a systematic review of the studies that assessed the risk of thrombosis associated with V617F Jak-2 in patients with ET or IM. Materials and Methods: We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE databases and reference lists of retrieved articles. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for each trial and pooled. Results: We included 21 studies involving patients with essential thrombocythaemia and 6 studies patients with idiopathic myelofibrosis. In essential thrombocythaemia patients, V617F Jak-2 was associated with a significant increased risk of thrombosis (OR 1.92, 95% CI 1.45-2.53), both of venous (OR 2.49, 95% CI 1.71-3.61) and arterial (OR 1.77, 95% CI 1.29-2.43) vessels. In idiopathic myelofibrosis patients, the risk of thrombosis associated with V617F Jak-2 tended to be increased (OR 1.76, 95% CI 0.91-3.41). Conclusions: Our systematic review suggests that V617F Jak-2 increases the risk of thrombosis in essential thrombocythaemia patients by about two fold while its role in idiopathic myelofibrosis patients is uncertain. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available