4.6 Article

Acquired activated protein C resistance is associated with IgG antibodies to protein S in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

Journal

THROMBOSIS RESEARCH
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages 127-131

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2008.11.006

Keywords

Anti-phospholipid antibodies; Systemic lupus erythematosus; Acquired activated protein C resistance; Anti-protein S antibodies; Lupus anticoagulant

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The objective of this study was to clarify the roles of anti-phospholipid antibodies (aPLs) in the pathogenesis of acquired activated protein C resistance (APC-R) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). We examined several aPLs levels (lupus anticoagulant, anti-cardiolipin antibodies, anti-beta 2-glycoprotein I antibodies, anti-protein C antibodies, and anti-protein S antibodies), the APC-R test, and the factor V Leiden test in 85 SLE patients. Acquired APC-R, which was not found in any patient with the factor V Leiden mutation, was present in 26 (30.6%) of 85 patients, and confirmed that acquired APC-R was a significant risk factor for thromboembolic complications [odd ratio (OR), 3.36; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.24-9.11]. Multivariate logistic analysis revealed that both LA and anti-PS strongly associated with the presence of APC-R. and that the correlation between anti-PS and APC-R was much stronger (OR, 46.7; 95%CI, 6.99-311) than that between LA and APC-R (OR, 11.3; 95%CI, 2.26-57.0). Furthermore, the mean value of APC sensitivity ratios was significantly lower in SLE patients with anti-PS (mean +/- SD, 1.68 +/- 037, p < 0.0001) than in those without anti-PS (2.23 +/- 0.40). These results suggest that acquired APC-R is most strongly attributable to functional interference of the APC pathway by anti-PS, which contribute to risk of thromboembolic complications. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available