4.6 Article

Reduced coagulation at high altitude identified by thromboelastography

Journal

THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS
Volume 107, Issue 6, Pages 1066-1071

Publisher

GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG
DOI: 10.1160/TH12-01-0004

Keywords

Altitude; hypoxia; blood coagulation; thrombelastography; blood coagulation tests

Funding

  1. Mr. John Caudwell, BOC Medical
  2. Eli Lilly
  3. London Clinic
  4. Smiths Medical
  5. Deltex Medical
  6. Rolex Foundation
  7. Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland
  8. United Kingdom Intensive Care Foundation
  9. Sir Halley Stewart Trust
  10. United Kingdom Department of Health's National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The impact of hypoxaemia on blood coagulation remains unclear despite use of a variety of measures to address the issue, We report the first use of thromboelastography (TEG) at high altitude to describe the dynamics of clot formation in whole blood samples. Seventeen healthy volunteers ascended to 5,300 m following an identical ascent profile; TEG measurements at 4,250 m and 5,300 m were compared with those from sea level. Peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO(2)) and haematocrit were also measured. Ascent resulted in a decline in SpO(2) from 97.8 (+/- 1.2) % at sea level to 86.9 (+/- 3.3) % at 4,250 m and 79.5 (+/- 5.8) % at 5,300 m (p<0.001); haematocrit rose from 43.7 (+/- 2.8) % at sea level, to 46.7 (+/- 3.9) % and 52.6 (+/- 3.2) % at 4,250 m and 5,300 m, respectively (p<0.01).TEG reaction (R)-time and kinetic (K)-time were both increased at 5,300 m compared to sea level, 8.95 (+/- 1.37) minutes (min) to 11.69 (+/- 2.91) min (p=0.016) and 2.40 (+/- 0.66) min to 4.99 (+/- 1.67) min (p<0.001), respectively. Additionally the alpha (alpha)- angle was decreased from 57.7 (+/- 8.2) to 51.6 (+/- 6.4) (p<0.001). There was no change in maximum amplitude (MA) on ascent to altitude. These changes are consistent with an overall pattern of slowed coagulation at high altitude.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available