4.6 Article

Use of inhaled corticosteroids and the risk of tuberculosis

Journal

THORAX
Volume 68, Issue 12, Pages 1105-1112

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2012-203175

Keywords

Tuberculosis

Funding

  1. National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency (NECA) in South Korea [NC2011-004]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) use could decrease local immunity of the lung. Concerns have been raised regarding the risk of tuberculosis (TB) development among ICS users. The aim of this study was to elucidate the association between ICS use and development of TB among patients with various respiratory diseases in South Korea, an intermediate-TB-burden country. Methods A nested case-control study based on the Korean national claims database was performed. The eligible cohort consisted of 853439 new adult users of inhaled respiratory medications between 1 January 2007 and 31 December 2010. Patients diagnosed as having TB after initiation of inhaled medication were included as cases. For each case individual, up to five control individuals matched for age, sex, diagnosis of asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and initiation date of inhaler use were selected. Results From the cohort population, we matched 4139 individuals diagnosed as having TB with 20583 controls. ICS use was associated with increased rate of TB diagnosis (adjusted OR (aOR), 1.20; 95% CI 1.08 to 1.34). The association was dose dependent (p for trend <0.001). A subgroup analysis revealed that ICS use increased the risk of TB development among non-users of oral corticosteroid (OCS) but not among OCS users. Conclusions ICS use increases the risk of TB in an intermediate-TB-burden country. Clinicians should be aware of the possibility of TB development among patients who are long-term high-dose ICS users.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available