4.6 Article

Safety, efficacy and convenience of colistimethate sodium dry powder for inhalation (Colobreathe DPI) in patients with cystic fibrosis: a randomised study

Journal

THORAX
Volume 68, Issue 4, Pages 344-350

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2012-202059

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Forest Laboratories UK, Dartford

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose To assess efficacy and safety of a new dry powder formulation of inhaled colistimethate sodium in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) aged >= 6 years with chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa lung infection. Study design and methods A prospective, centrally randomised, phase III, open-label study in patients with stable CF aged >= 6 years with chronic P aeruginosa lung infection. Patients were randomised to Colobreathe dry powder for inhalation (CDPI, one capsule containing colistimethate sodium 1 662 500 IU, twice daily) or three 28-day cycles with twice-daily 300 mg/5 ml tobramycin inhaler solution (TIS). Study duration was 24 weeks. Results 380 patients were randomised. After logarithmic transformation of data due to a non-normal distribution, adjusted mean difference between treatment groups (CDPI vs TIS) in change in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1 % predicted) at week 24 was -0.98% (95% CI -2.74% to 0.86%) in the intention-to-treat population (n=373) and -0.56% (95% CI -2.71% to 1.70%) in the per protocol population (n=261). The proportion of colistin-resistant isolates in both groups was <= 1.1%. The number of adverse events was similar in both groups. Significantly more patients receiving CDPI rated their device as 'very easy or easy to use' (90.7% vs 53.9% respectively; p<0.001). Conclusion CDPI demonstrated efficacy by virtue of non-inferiority to TIS in lung function after 24 weeks of treatment. There was no emergence of resistance of P aeruginosa to colistin. Overall, CDPI was well tolerated.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available