4.6 Article

Identification and prospective validation of clinically relevant chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) subtypes

Journal

THORAX
Volume 66, Issue 5, Pages 430-437

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/thx.2010.154484

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Fondo de Investigacion Sanitaria, Ministry of Health, Spain [FIS PI020541]
  2. Agencia d'Avaluacio de Tecnologia i Recerca Mediques, Catalonia government [AATRM 035/20/02]
  3. Spanish Society of Pneumology and Thoracic Surgery [SEPAR 2002/137]
  4. Catalan Foundation of Pneumology [FUCAP 2003]
  5. Red RESPIRA [RTIC C03/11]
  6. Red RCESP [RTIC C03/09]
  7. Fondo de Investigacion Sanitaria [PI052486, PI052302]
  8. Fundacio La Marato de TV3 [041110]
  9. Novartis Farmaceutica, Spain
  10. Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Ministry of Health, Spain
  11. Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Ministry of Health, Spain [CP05/00118]
  12. Generalitat de Catalunya

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is increasingly considered a heterogeneous condition. It was hypothesised that COPD, as currently defined, includes different clinically relevant subtypes. Methods To identify and validate COPD subtypes, 342 subjects hospitalised for the first time because of a COPD exacerbation were recruited. Three months after discharge, when clinically stable, symptoms and quality of life, lung function, exercise capacity, nutritional status, biomarkers of systemic and bronchial inflammation, sputum microbiology, CT of the thorax and echocardiography were assessed. COPD groups were identified by partitioning cluster analysis and validated prospectively against cause-specific hospitalisations and all-cause mortality during a 4 year follow-up. Results Three COPD groups were identified: group 1 (n=126, 67 years) was characterised by severe airflow limitation (postbronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) 38% predicted) and worse performance in most of the respiratory domains of the disease; group 2 (n=125, 69 years) showed milder airflow limitation (FEV1 63% predicted); and group 3 (n=91, 67 years) combined a similarly milder airflow limitation (FEV1 58% predicted) with a high proportion of obesity, cardiovascular disorders, diabetes and systemic inflammation. During follow-up, group 1 had more frequent hospitalisations due to COPD (HR 3.28, p < 0.001) and higher all-cause mortality (HR 2.36, p=0.018) than the other two groups, whereas group 3 had more admissions due to cardiovascular disease (HR 2.87, p=0.014). Conclusions In patients with COPD recruited at their first hospitalisation, three different COPD subtypes were identified and prospectively validated: 'severe respiratory COPD', 'moderate respiratory COPD', and 'systemic COPD'.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available