4.7 Article

Multi-scale modelling of dynamic progressive failure in composite laminates subjected to low velocity impact

Journal

THIN-WALLED STRUCTURES
Volume 131, Issue -, Pages 695-707

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2018.07.047

Keywords

Composite laminates; Micromechanics of failure (MMF); Stress amplification factors (SAFs); Finite element analysis (FEA); Multi-scale model

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFC0805601]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper aims to investigate the structural mechanical responses and progressive damage behaviors of composite laminates subjected to low velocity impact. First, a three-dimensional multi-scale model based on micromechanics of failure (MMF) criterion with new damage evolution laws is introduced for intralaminar damage, which considers the different mechanical behaviors of the microscopic constituents for fiber and matrix. The macroscopic damage variables of the new damage evolution laws are directly evaluated by the degraded elastic parameters of the microscopic constituents calculated from representative volume elements (RVEs). Second, by using this multi-scale approach, the relationship between macroscopic stress and microscopic stress is established by stress amplification factors (SAFs) through the RVEs using ABAQUS-PYTHON scripting language. The proposed model is implemented by the user-defined material subroutine VUMAT built on ABAQUS/Explicit platform, and the bilinear cohesive model in ABAQUS is employed to capture the onset and progression of interlaminar delamination. Finally, impact numerical simulation for the impact force-time/central displacement curves and energy dissipation is performed on three composite laminates with different layup patterns. Relatively good agreements are achieved between the experimental and numerical results, which validates the effectiveness of the multi-scale model.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available