4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Nanomechanical characterization of bioglass films synthesized by magnetron sputtering

Journal

THIN SOLID FILMS
Volume 553, Issue -, Pages 166-172

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.tsf.2013.10.104

Keywords

Bioglass films; Magnetron sputtering; Nanoindentation; Adherence; Biocompatibility

Funding

  1. Romanian National Authority for Scientific Research through UEFISCDI [TE49/2011]
  2. CICECO (Portugal)
  3. BegbrokeNano (Oxford, UK)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bioactive glasses are osteoproductive-type inorganic materials possessing the highest indices of bioactivity in both bulk and thin film forms. The prerequisites for reliable implant-type coatings are both their biological and mechanical performances. Whilst the bioglass films' structural, chemical and biological properties have been studied extensively, information about their mechanical performance is scarce. Here, transmission electron microscopy, energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, nanoindentation and pull-out measurements were employed to assess the morphological, chemical, structural and mechanical properties of the bioglass films deposited onto Ti substrates by radio-frequency magnetron sputtering (RF-MS). The biological safety of the thin bioglass films was evaluated preliminarily in vitro by investigating the adherence, proliferation and cytotoxicity of fibroblast cells cultivated on their surface. Our study emphasize the versatility of RF-MS, showing how bioglass films' features such as composition, structure, bonding strength, hardness, elastic modulus and biological response can be conveniently adapted by tuning the RF-MS working conditions, and therefore demonstrating the unexplored potential of this deposition technique for preparing quality biomimetic glass coatings. (C) 2013 Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available