4.4 Article

Influence of growth temperature on the electrical and structural characteristics of conductive Al-doped ZnO thin films grown by atomic layer deposition

Journal

THIN SOLID FILMS
Volume 545, Issue -, Pages 106-110

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.tsf.2013.07.045

Keywords

Atomic layer deposition; Al-doped ZnO; Transparent electrode; Doping; Growth temperature

Funding

  1. Energy International Collaboration Research & Development Program of the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP)
  2. Ministry of Knowledge Economy (MKE) [2011-8520010050]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
  4. Korea government (MEST) [2012-003849]
  5. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
  6. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [2012-0001447]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Al-doped ZnO thin films (AZO) were deposited by atomic layer deposition at various temperatures (100-300 degrees C) with a frequency ratio of 19/1 (Zn-O/Al-O), and their properties were evaluated. With increasing growth temperature, the Al contents in the AZO thin films were continuously increased, because of the rapid increase in the incorporation efficiency of the Al-O layer with respect to the Zn-O layer. Although low-temperature deposition resulted in the abnormal [100]-preferred orientation of the AZO films, they had a high carrier density of similar to 10(20) cm(3). However, the Hall mobility showed a low value of 1.5 cm(2)/Vs due to the high density of impurities such as C-O or O-H caused by incomplete reaction for precursors. In contrast, the electrical and structural properties of the AZO thin films were enhanced by increasing growth temperature, due to the increased Al doping level and reduced residual impurities, which was confirmed by X-ray diffraction and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. (C) 2013 Published by Elsevier B. V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available