4.4 Article

Influence of the kind and content of doped impurities on impurity-doped ZnO transparent electrode applications in thin-film solar cells

Journal

THIN SOLID FILMS
Volume 534, Issue -, Pages 426-431

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.tsf.2012.07.141

Keywords

Transparent conducting oxide; AZO; BZO; GZO; Thin-film solar cell; Haze value; Texture; Transparent electrode

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The influence of the kind and content of doped impurity on the electrical properties and their stability as well as on the light scattering characteristics and the surface texture formation obtainable bywet-chemical etching was investigated to develop transparent conducting impurity-doped ZnO thin films suitable for transparent electrode applications in thin-film solar cells. Al-, B- and Ga-doped ZnO (AZO, BZO and GZO) thin films were prepared on glass substrates at 200 C by doping each impurity at an appropriate content to achieve lower resistivity using a pulsed laser deposition and by varying the doped Al or Ga impurity content using r. f. superimposed d.c. magnetron sputtering deposition. The difference in the resulting electrical properties and their stability (air at 85% relative humidity and 85 degrees C) among the AZO, BZO and GZO thin films is attributed to the content of each impurity rather than the kind of impurity. In evaluations of the light scattering characteristics and the surface texture formation in a 0.1% HCl solution at 25 degrees C, the difference in the haze value obtainable among the AZO, BZO and GZO thin films is mainly attributed to the content of each impurity doped into the films. The AZO, BZO and GZO films prepared with doped impurity contents below approximately 2 at.% are suitable for transparent electrode applications in thin-film solar cells, irrespective of the kind of impurity as well as the deposition method used. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available