4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Thin film Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells processed from solution pastes with polymethyl methacrylate binder

Journal

THIN SOLID FILMS
Volume 519, Issue 21, Pages 7259-7263

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.tsf.2011.01.136

Keywords

Thin film solar cell; CIS, CIGS; Doctor blade method; Solution coating

Funding

  1. Swiss Federal Office of Energy [100964]
  2. European FP7 project NOVA-CIGS

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A non-vacuum, solution-based method is investigated to deposit thin layers of Cu(In,Ga)Se-2, which is the core component of CIGS thin film solar cells. The concept is based on paste coating of Cu, In, and Ga salt solution with an organic binder and a subsequent annealing of the paste in selenium atmosphere. Previous experiments with ethylcellulose as the binder resulted in photo conversion efficiencies up to 6.7%, although further improvements were hindered by a limited thickness of the CIGS layer and a residual carbon layer between the CIGS and metal back contact. In the present work, polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) is tested as an alternative binder material, which theoretically should leave no char residues upon thermal degradation at temperatures higher than 350 degrees C. A series of pastes with different solvents are prepared and the resulting CIGS layers are investigated systematically by microscopy, SEM, EDX, XRF, and XRD. Absorber layers are processed into Mo/CIGS/CdS/ZnO solar cells and their I-V characteristics are measured. PMMA can be used as the organic binder alternative to cellulose and more complete evaporation of the organic matrix is achieved as compared to the reference cellulose-containing recipe. However, maximum solar cell efficiencies are limited to 3% because the obtained CIGS layers are porous and contain traces of parasitic oxide phases when heated above 330 degrees C in ambient atmosphere. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available