4.4 Article

Reflectance of surfactant-templated mesoporous silica thin films: Simulations versus experiments

Journal

THIN SOLID FILMS
Volume 518, Issue 8, Pages 2134-2140

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.tsf.2009.08.006

Keywords

Mesoporous; Nanocomposite; Optical properties; Nanophotonics; Effective medium approximation; Photocatalysis

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [0449429]
  2. NERC
  3. [CHE-0527015]
  4. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys
  5. Directorate For Engineering [0449429] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, cubic and hexagonal mesoporous amorphous silica thin films were synthesized using evaporation-induced self-assembly process followed by calcination leaving highly ordered spherical or cylindrical pores in a silica matrix. The films featured pores with diameter between 4 and 11 nm, lattice parameter from 7.8 to 24 nm, and porosity between 22% and 45%. All films were dehydrated prior to reflectance measurements except for one film which was fully hydrated. The present study compares the spectral reflectance measured experimentally between 400 and 900 runt with that computed numerically by solving three-dimensional Maxwell's equations in mesoporous silica thin films with the same morphology as those synthesized. The matrix was assumed to have the same optical properties as bulk fused silica. The pore optical properties were either those of air or liquid water whether the film was dehydrated or hydrated, respectively. Excellent agreement was found between experimental and numerical reflectance for both cubic and hexagonal mesoporous silica films. This study experimentally validates our simulation too] and offers the prospect of ab-initio design of nanocomposite materials with arbitrary optical properties without using effective medium approximation or mixing rules. (C) 2009 Elsevier BY. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available