4.4 Article

Effects of mesoscopic poly (3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) films as counter electrodes for dye-sensitized solar cells

Journal

THIN SOLID FILMS
Volume 518, Issue 6, Pages 1716-1721

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.tsf.2009.11.058

Keywords

Conducting polymer; Dye-sensitized solar cells; Counter electrode; Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene); Carbon nanotubes

Funding

  1. Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan [AS-97-TP-A08]
  2. National Science Council (NSC) of Taiwan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Counter electrode coated with chemically polymerized poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT) in a dye-sensitized solar cell (DSSC) was studied. The surface morphology and the nature of I(-)/I(3)(-) redox reaction based on PEDOT film were investigated using Atomic Force Microscopy and Cyclic Voltammetry, respectively. The performance of the DSSCs containing the PEDOT coated electrode was compared with sputtered-Pt electrode. We found that the root mean square roughness decreases and conductivity increases as the molar ratio of imidazole (Im)/EDOT in the PEDOT film increases. The DSSC containing the PEDOT coated on fluorine doped tin oxide glass with Im/EDOT molar ratio of 2.0, showed a conversion efficiency of 7.44% compared to that with sputtered-Pt electrode (7.77%). The high photocurrents were attributed to the large effective Surface area of the electrode material resulting in good catalytic properties for T(3) reduction. Therefore, the incorporation of a multi-walled carbon nanotube (MWCNT) in the PEDOT film, coated on various substrates was also investigated. The DSSC containing the PEDOT films with 0.6 wt.% of MWCNT on stainless steel as counter electrode had the best cell performance of 8.08% with short-circuit current density, open-circuit voltage and fill factor of 17.00 mA cm(-2), 720 mV and 0.66, respectively. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available