4.4 Article

Fabrication and characterization of zirconium carbide (ZrC) nanofibers with thermal storage property

Journal

THIN SOLID FILMS
Volume 517, Issue 24, Pages 6531-6538

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.tsf.2009.04.021

Keywords

Zirconium carbide (ZrC); Electrospinning; Heat-treatment; Thermal emissivity

Funding

  1. Ministry of Knowledge Economy [RTI04-01-04]
  2. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [B0008557] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  3. Korea Institute of Industrial Technology(KITECH) [RTI04-01-04] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [핵06B1310] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Zirconium carbide (ZrC) nanofibers were fabricated by the electrospinning method and subsequent heat-treatment. The solution for electrospinning was prepared by dissolving zirconium acetyl acetonate and cellulose acetate in glacial acetic acid and 2,4-pentanedione as common solvents. The effects of the solution properties used for electrospinning, including the concentrations of the starting materials, the C/Zr ratio of the solutions, and soaking conditions, were investigated. The electrospinning process parameters and heat-treatment conditions were also investigated. The electrospun precursors and the heat-treated nanofibers; were characterized by scanning electron microscopy. X-ray diffraction, elemental analysis, and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. ZrC nanofibers with a thermal emissivity above 90% have a great potential for thermal storage barrier membrane. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available