4.4 Editorial Material

Subspecies and the philosophy of science

Journal

AUK
Volume 132, Issue 2, Pages 481-485

Publisher

AMER ORNITHOLOGISTS UNION
DOI: 10.1642/AUK-15-1.1

Keywords

diagnosability; effect size; Polioptila californica; reciprocal monophyly; subspecies

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Phylogenetic methods increasingly are brought to bear on questions of subspecies taxonomy, but several recent examples highlight the need for a clear and consistent philosophical approach to how genetic data are used to assess subspecies limits. Such standards are crucial conceptually, whether or not taxonomic decisions affect conservation decisions, as they might in a recent study focused on the California Gnatcatcher (Polioptila californica), a taxon currently protected under the U.S. Endangered Species Act. It is also crucial that any adopted framework allows each of a full range of alternatives to be either supported or rejected. In this spirit, in addition to recommending best practices, I propose an amendment to the phylogenetic species concept to include a subspecies category.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available