4.4 Article

Structure and mechanical properties of CrN/TiN multilayer coatings prepared by a combined HIPIMS/UBMS deposition technique

Journal

THIN SOLID FILMS
Volume 517, Issue 3, Pages 1239-1244

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.tsf.2008.06.080

Keywords

TiN/CrN; HIPIMS; Template effect; Wear resistance

Funding

  1. Austrian Federal Government
  2. Styrian Provincial Government

Ask authors/readers for more resources

CrN and TiN coatings are known for their high hardness and good wear resistance. The structure and the mechanical properties of such coatings can be improved by increasing the ion bombardment during Film growth. As high power impulse magnetron sputtering (HIPIMS) is known to allow high ion densities in the plasma, with a small deposition rate, we study the structure and mechanical properties of CrN/TiN multilayer coatings deposited by combining HIPIMS with conventional unbalanced magnetron sputtering (UBMS). Our results demonstrate that the microstructure of TiN coatings prepared by UBMS changes from dense columnar to open voided if a one fold substrate rotation is used where the films periodically leave and enter the plasma region in front of the target. Hence, also the hardness decreases from similar to 28 to 12 GPa if a one fold Substrate rotation is used. This drawback can be overcome if the coatings are prepared by HIPIMS, resulting in hardness values of similar to 39 and 34 GPa without and with a one fold substrate rotation, respectively. Recently, we reported a corresponding behaviour of CrN coatings. In a multilayer arrangement of TiN and CrN, where the TiN layers are prepared by UBMS and the CrN layers are prepared by HIPIMS the hardness with around 26 GPa is also Much higher as compared to I I GPa of the TiN single layer deposited by UBMS. Hence, HIPIMS also influences the plasma conditions in front of the cathode operated by UBMS. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available