3.9 Article

A Modified Method for Studying Behavioral Paradox of Antioxidants and Their Disproportionate Competitive Kinetic Effect to Scavenge the Peroxyl Radical Formation

Journal

SCIENTIFIC WORLD JOURNAL
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

HINDAWI PUBLISHING CORPORATION
DOI: 10.1155/2014/931581

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), New Delhi, India [BSC0121]
  2. Science and Engineering Research Board, Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, Government of India
  3. Council of Science and Technology, Government of Uttar Pradesh
  4. Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We have described a modified method for evaluating inhibitor of peroxyl radicals, a well-recognized and -documented radical involved in cancer initiation and promotion as well as diseases related to oxidative stress and ageing. We are reporting hydrophilic and lipophilic as well as natural and synthetic forms of antioxidants revealing a diversified behaviour to peroxyl radical in a dose-dependent manner (1 nM-10 mu M). A simple kinetic model for the competitive oxidation of an indicator molecule (ABTS) and a various antioxidant by a radical (ROO center dot) is described. The influences of both the concentration of antioxidant and duration of reaction (70 min) on the inhibition of the radical cation absorption are taken into account while determining the activity. The induction time of the reaction was also proposed as a parameter enabling determination of antioxidant content by optimizing and introducing other kinetic parameters in 96-well plate assays. The test evidently improves the original PRTC (peroxyl radical trapping capacity) assay in terms of the amount of chemical used, simultaneous tracking, that is, the generation of the radical taking place continually and the kinetic reduction technique (area under curve, peak value, slope, and V-max).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available