3.9 Article

Glutathione Redox System in β-Thalassemia/Hb E Patients

Journal

SCIENTIFIC WORLD JOURNAL
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

HINDAWI LTD
DOI: 10.1155/2013/543973

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Research Council of Thailand
  2. Chalermphrakiat Grant, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital
  3. Office of the Higher Education Commission under the National Research Universities Initiative
  4. Mahidol University under the National Research Universities Initiative
  5. Siriraj Graduate Thesis Scholarship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

beta-thalassemia/Hb E is known to cause oxidative stress induced by iron overload. The glutathione system is the major endogenous antioxidant that protects animal cells from oxidative damage. This study aimed to determine the effect of disease state and splenectomy on redox status expressed by whole blood glutathione (GSH)/glutathione disulfide (GSSG) and also to evaluate glutathione-related responses to oxidation in beta-thalassemia/Hb E patients. Twenty-seven normal subjects and 25 beta-thalassemia/Hb E patients were recruited and blood was collected. The GSH/GSSG ratio, activities of glutathione-related enzymes, hematological parameters, and serum ferritin levels were determined in individuals. Patients had high iron-induced oxidative stress, shown as significantly increased serum ferritin, a decreased GSH/GSSG ratio, and increased activities of glutathione-related enzymes. Splenectomy increased serum ferritin levels and decreased GSH levels concomitant with unchanged glutathione-related enzyme activities. The redox ratio had a positive correlation with hemoglobin levels and negative correlation with levels of serum ferritin. The glutathione system may be the body's first-line defense used against oxidative stress and to maintain redox homeostasis in thalassemic patients based on the significant correlations between the GSH/GSSH ratio and degree of anemia or body iron stores.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available