Journal
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH
Volume 10, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13018-015-0273-x
Keywords
Elbow dislocation; Fluoroscopy; Stress test; Elbow instability; Drop sign; Joint incongruence
Categories
Funding
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
- Ruprecht-Karls-Universitat Heidelberg
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Background: Conservative treatment of simple elbow dislocations can lead to complications such as persisting pain and restricted joint mobility. The current aim was to identify patients with deteriorated outcome after conservative treatment and to investigate a possible association with initial joint (in) stability. Methods: Sixty-eight patients (mean age 37.1 +/- 17.2 years) with simple elbow dislocations received conservative treatment. After closed reduction, joint stability was tested by varus and valgus stress under fluoroscopy. According to the findings under fluoroscopy, three different groups of instability could be identified: (1) slight instability (joint angulation <10 degrees; n = 49), (2) moderate instability (angulation >= 10 degrees; n = 19) and (3) gross instability. Patients with gross instability (re-dislocation under stability testing) were treated with primary surgical ligament repair and therefore excluded from this study. Additionally, MRIs and radiographs were analysed regarding warning signs of instability such as the drop sign and joint incongruence. Main outcome parameters were the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), range of motion (ROM), complications and revision rates. Results: After 40.7 +/- 20.4 months, the overall MEPS was excellent (94.2 +/- 11.3) with a trend of slightly worse clinical results in group 2 (95.8 +/- 9.0 vs. 90.0 +/- 15.2 points; p = 0.154). In group 1, significantly more patients achieved an excellent result regarding the MEPS scoring system (77.6 vs. 52.6 %; p = 0.043) and elbow extension was significantly worse in group 2 (5.3 +/- 9.9 degrees vs. 1.4 +/- 3.0 degrees; p = 0.015). Seven treatment complications occurred in group 2 (36.8 %) compared with two in group 1 (4.1 %, p < 0.0001). Six patients (8.8 %) needed secondary surgery with an 8.4-fold higher risk for revision surgery in group 2 (p = 0.007). The presence of a positive drop sign or joint incongruence led to higher odds ratio (OR) for complications (OR = 15.9) and revision surgery (OR = 10.3). Conclusions: This study demonstrates that patients with moderate joint instability after simple elbow dislocation have a significantly worse clinical outcome, more complications and a higher need for secondary revision surgery following conservative treatment compared to patients with slight elbow instability.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available