4.5 Article

Evaluate the potential environmental toxicity of quantum dots on ciliated protozoa by microcalorimetry

Journal

THERMOCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 547, Issue -, Pages 62-69

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.tca.2012.08.013

Keywords

Toxicity; Quantum dots; T. thermophila BF5; Microcalorimetry; Fluorescence inverted microscopy

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21203035, 20921062, 20961001]
  2. Chinese Ministry of Education [2010168]
  3. Guangxi Natural Science Foundation [2010GXNSFB013014]
  4. Scientific Research Fund of Guangxi Provincial Education Department [201106LX273]
  5. Scientific Research and Technology Development Plan of Nanning City [201107010B]
  6. Key Laboratory of Beibu Gulf Environment Change and Resources Utilization (Guangxi Teachers Education University), Ministry of Education, China

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the present study, we evaluated the toxic effects of mercaptoacetic acid (MM)-capped CdSe QDs and CdSe/ZnS QDs to particle-ingesting model ciliated protozoa Tetrahymena thermophila BF5 (T. thermophila BF5) by using a TAM air isothermal microcalorimeter. These results suggested that both MAA-CdSe QDs and MM-CdSe/ZnS QDs were indeed acutely toxic for T. thermophila BF5 growth in a dose-dependent manner, and the toxicities of both MAA-CdSe QDs and MAA-CdSe/ZnS QDs increased dramatically after UV irradiation due to the liberation of more toxic Cd2+, which indicated that the toxicity of MAA-CdSe/ZnS QDs was less than that of MAA-CdSe QDs. Furthermore, the toxicity of different ligands-capped CdSe/ZnS QDs on T. thermophila BF5 was also investigated. The uptake of MAA-CdSe/ZnS QDs and adenosine 5'-monophosphate (AMP)-CdSe/ZnS QDs by cells and the morphological change during the process of T. thermophila BF5 growth incubated with these QDs were further studied by fluorescence inverted microscopy. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available