4.5 Article

In situ prepared PBSu/SiO2 nanocomposites. Study of thermal degradation mechanism

Journal

THERMOCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 495, Issue 1-2, Pages 120-128

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.tca.2009.06.010

Keywords

Nanocomposites; Aliphatic polyester; Poly(butylene succinate); Fumed silica; Thermal degradation; Kinetic analysis

Funding

  1. E.U.-European Social Fund
  2. Greek Ministry of Development-GSRT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A series of nanocomposites consisted of poly(butylene succinate) (PBSu) and fumed silica nanoparticles (SiO2)were prepared using the in situ polymerization technique. The amount of SiO2 used directly affected the final molecular weight of the prepared polyesters. At a low SiO2 content (0.5 wt.%) the molecular weight obtained was higher compared to neat PBSu, however at higher concentrations this was gradually reduced. The melting point of the matrix remained unaffected by the addition of the nanoparticles, in contrast to the crystallinity, which was dramatically reduced at higher SiO2 contents. This was mainly due to the extended branching and cross-linking reactions that took place between the carboxylic end groups of PBSu and the surface silanols of the nanoparticles. Thermal degradation of the PBSu/SiO2 nanocomposites was studied by determining theirs mass loss during heating. From the variations of the activation energies, calculated from the thermogravimetric Curves, it was clear that nanocomposites containing 1 wt% SiO2 content had a higher activation energy compared to pure PBSu, indicating that the addition of the nanoparticles could slightly increase the thermal stability of the matrix. However, in PBSu/SiO2 nanocomposite containing 5 wt.% SiO2 the activation energy was smaller. This phenomenon should be attributed to the existence of extended branched and cross-linked macromolecules, which reduce the thermal stability of PBSu, rather than to the addition of fumed silica nanoparticles. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available