4.6 Article

Production of cloned calves by combination treatment of both donor cells and early cloned embryos with 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine and trichostatin A

Journal

THERIOGENOLOGY
Volume 75, Issue 5, Pages 819-825

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2010.10.022

Keywords

Cloned calves; In vivo development; 5-aza-dC; Trichostatin A; Somatic cell nuclear transfer

Funding

  1. National Key Project for Production of Transgenic Livestock, China [2008ZX08007-004]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We previously reported that treatment of both donor cells and early cloned embryos with a combination of 0.01 mu M 5-aza-2'-Deoxycytidine (5-aza-dC) and 0.05 mu M trichostatin A (TSA) significantly improved development of cloned bovine embryos in vitro. In the present study, we investigated the effect of this combination treatment on the in vivo development potency and postnatal survivability of cloned calves. Blastocysts (77 and 82 blastocysts derived from untreated (control) and treated groups, respectively) were individually transferred to recipient cows. Relative to the control group, the combination treatment of both donor cells and early embryos with 5-aza-dC and TSA dramatically increased the cleavage rate (49.2 vs 63.6%, P < 0.05) at 24 h of culture, and blastocyst development rate on Days 6 and 7 of culture (18.8 vs 33.9% and 27.1 vs 38.5% respectively, P < 0.05). Although pregnancy rate did not differ 40 d after transfer, it was lower in the treated than control group 90 d after transfer (7.8 vs 29.3%, P < 0.05). In the control group, there were three calves born to 77 recipients (only two survived beyond 60 d), whereas in the treated group, 17 calves were born to 82 recipients, and 11 survived beyond 60 d. In conclusion, a combination treatment of donor cells and early cloned embryos with 5-aza-dC and TSA significantly enhanced development of somatic cell cloned bovine embryos in vivo; cloning efficiency (number of surviving calves at 60 d of birth/number of recipient cows) was increased from 2.6 to 13.4%. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available