4.6 Article

Increased pre-implantation development of cloned bovine embryos treated with 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine and trichostatin A

Journal

THERIOGENOLOGY
Volume 70, Issue 4, Pages 622-630

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.04.042

Keywords

cloned embryo; pre-implantation development; blastocyst quality; 5-aza-2 '-deoxycytidine; trichostatin A

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Limited success of somatic cell nuclear transfer is attributed to incomplete reprogramming of transferred nuclei. The objective was to determine if 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine (5-aza-dC) and trichostatin A (TSA) promoted reprogramming and improved development. Relative to untreated controls, treatment of donor cells, cloned embryos, and continuous treatment of both donor cells and cloned embryos with a combination of 0.01 mu M 5-aza-dC and 0.05 mu M TSA significantly increased the blastocyst rate (11.9% vs 31.7%, 12.4% vs 25.6%, and 13.3% vs 38.4%, respectively) and total cell number (73.2 vs 91.1, 75.2 vs 93.7, and 74.6 vs 96.7). Moreover, blastocyst rate and inner cell mass (ICM) cell number of embryos continuously exposed to both reagents were significantly higher than that of a TSA-treated group (38.4% vs 23.9% and 27.4 vs 18.2). The DNA methylation level of 2-cell embryos was decreased significantly, whereas the histone acetylation level increased dramatically after donor cell treatment and continuous treatment with both reagents. However, these epigenetic features of cloned blastocysts were not significantly different than the untreated control group. Following embryo treatment. DNA methylation and histone acetylation levels of cloned blastocysts were unchanged, except for the group given 0.5 mu M TSA (acetylation level was significantly increased, but development potential was reduced). In conclusion, development of cloned bovine embryos was enhanced by 5-aza-dC and TSA; furthermore, the combination was more effective than either one alone. (c) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available