4.1 Article

Timing of Dialysis Initiation and Mortality Risk in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Meta-Analysis

Journal

THERAPEUTIC APHERESIS AND DIALYSIS
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages 600-608

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1744-9987.12721

Keywords

Chronic kidney disease; Dialysis; Early; Estimated glomerular filtration rate, Initiation; Late; Mortality

Funding

  1. Major State Basic Research Development Program of China [2013CB530803]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [H0511-81370843, H0511-81670677]
  3. Chinese Society of Nephrology [15020020590]
  4. Innovation of Science and Technology Achievement Transformation Fund of Jiangsu Province [BL 2012066]
  5. Jiangsu Health International Exchange Program [JSH-2015-008]
  6. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions [JX10231801]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The optimal time of dialysis initiation among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is unclear in recent years. We performed a meta-analysis to assess the association of early vs. late initiation of dialysis with estimated glomerular filtration rate. PUBMED, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and article reference lists were searched for relevant observational trials. A pooled hazard ratio (HR) with 95% CI was used to estimate the mortality risk. Twenty-six cohort studies and one randomized controlled trial were identified. Early start of dialysis was associated with the increased risk of mortality (HR = 1.23, 95% CI: 1.04-1.43) compared with late start of dialysis. In the subgroup analysis, age younger than 65 years at the early start of dialysis demonstrated higher mortality (HR = 1.20, 95% CI: 1.05-1.35) than the late start. Compared with peritoneal dialysis, the pooled HR with HD was 1.25 (95% CI: 1.17-1.34). Early start of dialysis increased the mortality risk compared with late start among patients with CKD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available