4.2 Article

Theoretical study on the chemical fate of adducts formed through free radical addition reactions to carotenoids

Journal

THEORETICAL CHEMISTRY ACCOUNTS
Volume 127, Issue 5-6, Pages 595-603

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00214-010-0753-3

Keywords

Carotenoids; Radical reactions; Computational chemistry; Antioxidants; Thermochemistry

Funding

  1. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia (CONACyT) [49057-F]
  2. DGAPA-UNAM-Mexico

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It is well known that free radicals are responsible for oxidative stress and cause numerous health disorders. As a result, the study of molecules that can scavenge free radicals is significant. One of the most important classes of free radical scavengers are carotenoids (CAR). In this work, the effectiveness of the CAR in terms of the radical adduct formation (RAF) reaction is studied using density functional theory calculations (in polar and non-polar environments). The reactions between four CAR [beta-carotene (BC), zeaxanthin (ZEA), canthaxanthin (CANTA) and astaxanthin (ASTA)] with eight different radicals ((OH)-O-center dot, (OOH)-O-center dot, CH3, O-center dot-CH3, (OO)-O-center dot-CH3, (SH)-S-center dot, O-center dot-CH2-CH=CH2, and (OO)-O-center dot-CH2-CH=CH2), as well as substantial further reactions involved in the radical chain propagation, are analyzed. According to our results, the RAF reactions are controlled to a larger extent by the nature of the free radical than by the particular CAR they are reacting with. Thermochemistry calculations predict that each CAR molecule is able to scavenge at least two free radicals, which would lead to the termination of the radical chain process. Epoxy and diepoxy CAR species can be formed, being epoxy molecules as good free radical scavengers as their parent CAR. ASTA and CANTA are predicted to be less reactive, when reacting through RAF mechanism, than BC and ZEA.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available