4.2 Article

Enhanced detonation sensitivities of silicon analogs of PETN: reaction force analysis and the role of σ-hole interactions

Journal

THEORETICAL CHEMISTRY ACCOUNTS
Volume 127, Issue 4, Pages 345-354

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00214-009-0723-9

Keywords

PETN; Si-PETN; Reaction force; Silicon-oxygen interactions; sigma-Hole interactions; Impact sensitivities; Nitrate esters; Energetic molecules

Funding

  1. Defense Threat Reduction Agency [HDTRA1-07-1-0002]
  2. LMU
  3. U.S. Army Research Laboratory (ARL) [W911NF-09-2-0018]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Si-pentaerythritol tetranitrate (PETN), Si[CH2ONO2](4), is a silicon analog of the widely used explosive PETN, C[CH2ONO2](4). Si-PETN is extremely sensitive to impact, much more so than PETN. This was attributed by Liu et al. to Si-PETN having a much lower activation barrier to decomposition, via a facile rearrangement that is not as readily available to PETN, and which releases considerable energy that can promote further steps. We have investigated computationally why the barrier to the rearrangement is so much lower for Si-PETN than for PETN, using 5, (H3C)(3)C-CH2ONO2, and 6, (H3C)(3)Si-CH2ONO2, as models for PETN and Si-PETN. Reaction force analysis shows that most of the difference between the rearrangement barriers for 5 and 6 comes about in the initial (reactant) stages of the processes, in which 6 benefits from a 1,3 electrostatic interaction involving a positive sigma-hole on the silicon and the negative linking oxygen. The analogous interaction is weaker in 5, since the central carbon does not have positive sigma-holes; furthermore, this carbon is less able than silicon to temporarily expand its coordination sphere. A similar explanation involving a positive silicon sigma-hole and a linking oxygen is proposed for Si-PETN. The greater exothermicity of the rearrangement of 6 (and also Si-PETN) can be rationalized, following Liu et al., in terms of the formation of the strong Si-O bond.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available