4.7 Article

Numerical model for the zonal disintegration of the rock mass around deep underground workings

Journal

THEORETICAL AND APPLIED FRACTURE MECHANICS
Volume 67-68, Issue -, Pages 65-73

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.tafmec.2013.11.005

Keywords

Zonal disintegration; Mechanical damage; Dynamic process; FLAC(3D)

Funding

  1. 973 Program [2010CB732002]
  2. General Programs of National Natural Science Foundation of China [51179098, 51134001]
  3. Ph.D. Programs Foundation of the Ministry of Education of China [20120131110031]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Deep underground excavation can produce zonal disintegration in the surrounding rock under certain conditions. This phenomenon has mainly been studied in a qualitative manner using in situ investigations or laboratory experiments. Researchers have also derived analytical solutions, which resulted in the formation conditions for zonal disintegration. However, the analytic solutions developed to date are not suitable for practical engineering applications because of the stringent model requirements and complicated boundary conditions. To investigate the mechanism of zonal disintegration, a numerical method is proposed to model the phenomenon. The following concepts are incorporated into FLAC(3D) via its built-in FISH. First, coal mine (or tunnel) excavation is considered as a dynamic process. Second, the element failure criteria are developed based on the maximum tensile stress criterion and strain energy density theory. Third, the mechanical damage is modeled through a decrease in the multi-step elastic modulus, i.e., the nonlinear stress-strain behavior is approximated by the multi-linear elastic softening model. Two practical cases with zonal disintegration are simulated using the proposed method. Both simulations predict the same number of fractured zones at the same location as those obtained through in situ monitoring. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available