4.5 Article

Single and dual crop coefficients and crop evapotranspiration for wheat and maize in a semi-arid region

Journal

THEORETICAL AND APPLIED CLIMATOLOGY
Volume 114, Issue 3-4, Pages 495-510

Publisher

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00704-013-0848-6

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Shiraz University Research Council [91-GR-AGR-42]
  2. Drought National Research Institute
  3. Center of Excellence on Farm Water Management

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, weighing lysimeters were used to investigate the daily crop coefficient and evapotranspiration of wheat and maize in the Fars province, Iran. The locally calibrated Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) Penman-Monteith equation was used to calculate the reference crop evapotranspiration (ETo). Micro-lysimetry was used to measure soil evaporation (E). Transpiration (T) was estimated by the difference between crop evapotranspiration (ETc) and E. The single crop coefficient (K (c)) was calculated by the ratio of ETc to ETo. Furthermore, the dual crop coefficient is composed of the soil evaporation coefficient (K (e)) and the basal crop coefficients (K (cb)) calculated from the ratio of E and T to ETo, respectively. The maximum measured evapotranspiration rate for wheat was 9.9 mm day(-1) and for maize was 10 mm day(-1). The total evaporation from the soil surface was about 30 % of the total wheat ETc and 29.8 % of total maize ETc. The single crop coefficient (K (c)) values for the initial, mid-, and end-season growth stages of maize were 0.48, 1.40, and 0.31 and those of wheat were 0.77, 1.35, and 0.26, respectively. The measured K (c) values for the initial and mid-season stages were different from the FAO recommended values. Therefore, the FAO standard equation for K (c)-(mid) was calibrated locally for wheat and maize. The K (cb) values for the initial, mid-, and end-season growth stages were 0.23, 1.14, and 0.13 for wheat and 0.10, 1.07, and 0.06 for maize, respectively. Furthermore, the FAO procedure for single crop coefficient showed better predictions on a daily basis, although the dual crop coefficient method was more accurate on seasonal scale.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available