4.5 Article

Temperature reconstruction from tree-ring maximum latewood density of Qinghai spruce in middle Hexi Corridor, China

Journal

THEORETICAL AND APPLIED CLIMATOLOGY
Volume 107, Issue 3-4, Pages 633-643

Publisher

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00704-011-0512-y

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2010CB951001]
  2. Meteorology Public welfare Industry [GYHY201106013, GYHY200806011]
  3. science and technology ministry of China [2007FY220200]
  4. NSFC [40975056, 41071072, 41005059]
  5. China Desert Meteorological Science Research Foundation [SQJ2010011]
  6. Foundation of Xinjiang Laboratory of Tree-ring Ecology [XJYS0911-2009-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Seven different tree-ring parameters (tree-ring width, earlywood width, latewood width, maximum density, minimum density, mean earlywood density, and mean latewood density) were obtained from Qinghai spruce (Picea crassifolia) at one chronology site in the Hexi Corridor, China. The chronologies were analyzed individually and then compared with each other. Growth-climate response analyses showed that the tree-ring width and maximum latewood density (MXD) are mainly influenced by warm season temperature variability. Based on the relationships derived from the climate response analysis, the MXD chronology was used to reconstruct the May-August maximum temperature for the period 1775-2008 A.D., and it explained the 38.1% of the total temperature variance. It shows cooling in the late 1700s to early 1800s and warming in the twentieth century. Spatial climate correlation analyses with gridded land surface data revealed that our warm season temperature reconstruction contains a strong large-scale temperature signal for north China. Comparison with regional and Northern Hemisphere reconstructions revealed similar low-frequency change to longer-term variability. Several cold years coincide with major volcanic eruptions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available