4.5 Article

The effects of surface energy and roughness on the hydrophobicity of woven fabrics

Journal

TEXTILE RESEARCH JOURNAL
Volume 84, Issue 12, Pages 1268-1278

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0040517513495945

Keywords

Hydrophobic; lotus effect; roughness factor; Wenzel model; Cassie-Baxter model

Funding

  1. Science Research Center/Engineering Research Center Program of Ministry of Science and Technology/Korea Science and Engineering Foundation [R11-2005-065]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea Grant - Korean Government [2011-0014765]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2011-0014765, 22B20130000043] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The wetting behavior of a hydrophobic rough surface is investigated on a surface fabricated by applying low surface tension materials such as silicone or fluoropolymer to polyester woven fabric consisting of multifilament yarns. The roughness factor of various woven fabrics can be calculated by Wenzel's and Cassie-Baxter's equations. For the fabrics treated with silicone or fluoropolymer, the Cassie-Baxter model was applied, showing a level of agreement for the fabric specimens non-textured filament fibers between the predicted contact angles and the measured values. More precisely, the fabrics treated with silicone or fluoropolymer represent the transitional state between the Wenzel type and the Cassie-Baxter type; that is, the fractional contact area between the water and air f(2) is greater than zero, and the sum of the fractional contact areas for solid-water f(1) and air-water f(2) is greater than 1. A surface with lower energy and higher roughness gave f(1) + f(2) close to 1 with smaller f(1) and larger f(2), which resulted in a high contact angle.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available