4.4 Article

Electronic helix theory-guided rational design of kinetic resolutions by means of the Sharpless asymmetric dihydroxylation reactions

Journal

TETRAHEDRON
Volume 68, Issue 36, Pages 7288-7294

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tet.2012.06.102

Keywords

Polarizability; Sharpless asymmetric dihydroxylation; Electronic helix theory; Stereochemistry; Kinetic resolution

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation of China [20872004, 20972008]
  2. National '973 Project' from the State Ministry of Science and Technology of China
  3. Shenzhen Bureau of Science, Technology and Information
  4. Shenzhen 'Shuang Bai Project'

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Kinetic resolution represents a key chemical reaction strategy for asymmetric synthesis of optically enriched compounds, and it originates from a simple phenomenon that a pair of mirror images (enantiomers) of a racemate can react with different rates under a chiral environment. While highly efficient catalytic kinetic resolutions by means of the classical Sharpless asymmetric epoxidation (AE) reactions are well established in modern organic synthesis, such systems based on the arguably more versatile Sharpless asymmetric dihydroxylation (AD) processes, although long pursued and widely attempted, remain largely underexplored. With insights gained from a new electronic helix theory we recently developed for molecular chirality and chiral interactions, we were able to advance a proposal suggesting why this problem is challenging and how it might be solved. Guided by a new design concept aimed at identifying complimentary catalyst-substrate electronic interactions, we reported herein that not only can such elusive systems be generally feasible, but efficiencies well reach the highest levels known to date with chemical or enzymatic kinetic resolutions of any type. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available