4.2 Article

Parent-rated measures of bilingual children's speech accuracy: Implications for a universal speech screen

Journal

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/17549507.2015.1081284

Keywords

speech sound disorder; bilingualism; Speech screen

Funding

  1. Academy of Korean Studies Grant - Korean Government (MEST) [AKS-2012-BAA-2101]
  2. Ministry of Education (MOE), Republic of South Korea [AKS-2012-BAA-2101] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: This study investigated whether parents were reliable in judging their bilingual children's speech and whether parent-rated measure of children's speech could be used as a tool for a universal speech screen to identify children with speech sound disorder (SSD). Method: Single word samples from 33 Korean-English bilingual (KEB) pre-school children were analysed for percentage of consonants correct (PCC). Their parents completed the Intelligibility in Context Scale and a similarly constructed scale devised by Stertzbach and Gildersleeve-Neumann. Spearman rank correlations were used to examine the association between the PCC scores and the parent-rated measures. Result: A number of factors influenced parents' reliability in judging their bilingual children's speech, including language dominance and the nature of the questions that were asked. The perception of strangers on a child's speech problems, as judged by the parents, could be significant in identifying children with SSD. When the cut-off ICS mean score derived from a previous monolingual research was applied to KEB children, over 40% of the sample was identified as requiring a comprehensive clinical assessment. Conclusion: Implementation of a universal speech screen utilising parent-rated measures of children's speech cannot be introduced without further research.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available