4.5 Article

Development of arc-continent collision melanges: Linking onshore geological and offshore geophysical observations of the Pliocene Lichi Melange, southern Taiwan and northern Luzon arc, western Pacific

Journal

TECTONOPHYSICS
Volume 636, Issue -, Pages 70-82

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.tecto.2014.08.009

Keywords

Melange; Taiwan; Arc-continental collision; Backthrust; Seismic reflection profiles; Side-scan sonar

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although the Lichi melange has been studied intensively over the last decade, its enigmatic nature has generated debates regarding its origin and evolution. Two prominent models have been proposed to explain the Lichi melange: the olistostrome model with slumping sediments and the tectonic collision model with intensive shearing. Neither model can explain what causes the interpreted slumping and complex faulting processes for the sediments. Here, we study the Lichi melange using a time-space equivalence approach, in which the tectonics of the offshore continuation of the Lichi melange should represent an earlier stage in its evolution. Our study of marine multichannel seismic data suggested that the backthrusts in the accretionary prism propagate arcward above and within the deforming forearc and arc basement to incorporate the sediment and basement materials into the rear of the accretionary prism. Therefore, we proposed the retrowedge evolution model whose novel key feature is that the irregular topography of the arc basement affects the taper angle of the retrowedge. The retrowedge has a greater taper than the minimum taper of the prowedge, so the slope can be steeper, and thus favors gravitational failure. Such processes would generate complex faulting and slumping processes in the backthrusted forearc ridge and basin. In sum, this retrowedge model reconciles the mixture of slumping and faulting processes found in the Lichi melange. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available