4.5 Article

The origin of the Baydaric microcontinent, Mongolia: Constraints from paleomagnetism and geochronology

Journal

TECTONOPHYSICS
Volume 485, Issue 1-4, Pages 306-320

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.tecto.2010.01.012

Keywords

Central Asia orogenic belt; Geochronology; Paleomagnetism; Mongolia

Funding

  1. Geological Institute in Ulaan-Bator, Mongolia
  2. Division of Earth Sciences
  3. Office of International Science and Engineering's Eastern
  4. U.S. National Science Foundation [EAR05-08597]
  5. Russian Foundation of Basic Research [07-05-00021]
  6. Earth Science Division, Russian Academy of Sciences

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Existing views on the tectonic evolution of the Central Asian orogenic belt (CAOB) are highly controversial and the Neoproterozoic to Cambrian stages of this evolution remain the most enigmatic. However, the views on the Paleozoic evolution of the CAOB crucially depend on these early stages, as different choices of the starting point lead to very dissimilar Paleozoic reconstructions. In this context numerous microcontinents with the Precambrian basement that are included in the mosaic structure of Kazakhstan, Tien Shan, Altai and Mongolia are of particular interest. We undertook a paleomagnetic, geochemical and geochronological study of the Neoproterozoic volcanics from one of these units - the Baydaric microcontinent in Central Mongolia. According to U-Pb (laser ablation) dating the age of the studied Dzabkhan Volcanics is about 770-805 Ma. Thermal demagnetization revealed that most of the studied samples retained a pre-tilting component, whose primary origin is supported by a conglomerate test. These new data, together with available geological information allow us to conclude that about 770-800 Ma ago the Baydaric domain was located at a latitude of 47(-12)(+16)degrees N and belonged to one of the following plates: India, South China, Tarim or Australia. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available