4.6 Article

Structure and kinematics of the Taupo Rift, New Zealand

Journal

TECTONICS
Volume 33, Issue 6, Pages 1178-1199

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2014TC003569

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Core GNS Science Fund
  2. Sarah Beanland Memorial scholarship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The structure and kinematics of the continental intra-arc Taupo Rift have been constrained by fault-trace mapping, a large catalogue of focal mechanisms (N = 202) and fault slip striations. The mean extension direction of similar to 137 degrees is approximately orthogonal to the regional trend of the rift and arc front (alpha = 84 degrees and 79 degrees, respectively) and to the strike of the underlying subducting Pacific Plate. Bending and rollback of the subduction hinge strongly influence the location, orientation, and extension direction of intra-arc rifting in the North Island. In detail, orthogonal rifting (alpha = 85-90 degrees) transitions northward to oblique rifting (alpha = 69-71 degrees) across a paleovertical-axis rotation boundary where rift faults, extension directions, and basement fabric rotate by similar to 20-25 degrees. Toward the south, extension is orthogonal to normal faults which are parallel to, and reactivate, steeply dipping basement fabric. Basement reactivation facilitates strain partitioning with a portion of margin-parallel motion in the overriding plate mainly accommodated east of the rift by strike-slip faults in the North Island Fault System (NIFS). Toward the north where the rift and NIFS intersect, similar to 4 mm/yr strike slip is transferred into the rift with net oblique extension accommodating a component of margin-parallel motion. The trend and kinematics of the Taupo Rift are comparable to late Miocene-Pliocene intra-arc rifting in the Taranaki Basin, indicating that the northeast strike of the subducting plate and the southeast extension direction have been uniform since at least 4 Ma.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available