4.6 Article

Neogene uplift of the Tian Shan Mountains observed in the magnetic record of the Jingou River section (northwest China)

Journal

TECTONICS
Volume 28, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2007TC002137

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. French program ECLIPSE
  2. PRA [T05-02/T06-04]
  3. ANR
  4. [kzcx3-sw-147]
  5. [2005CB422101]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Tian Shan Mountains constitute central Asia's longest and highest mountain range. Understanding their Cenozoic uplift history thus bears on mountain building processes in general, and on how deformation has occurred under the influence of the India-Asia collision in particular. In order to help decipher the uplift history of the Tian Shan, we collected 970 samples for magnetostratigraphic analysis along a 4571-m-thick section at the Jingou River (Xinjiang Province, China). Stepwise alternating field and thermal demagnetization isolate a linear magnetization component that is interpreted as primary. From this component, a magnetostratigraphic column composed of 67 polarity chrons are correlated with the reference geomagnetic polarity timescale between similar to 1 Ma and similar to 23.6 Ma, with some uncertainty below similar to 21 Ma. This correlation places precise temporal control on the Neogene stratigraphy of the southern Junggar Basin and provides evidence for two significant stepwise increases in sediment accumulation rate at similar to 16-15 Ma and similar to 11-10 Ma. Rock magnetic parameters also undergo important changes at similar to 16-15 Ma and similar to 11-10 Ma that correlate with changes in sedimentary depositional environments. Together with previous work, we conclude that growth history of the modern Tian Shan Mountains includes two pulses of uplift and erosion at similar to 16-15 Ma and similar to 11-10 Ma. Middle to upper Tertiary rocks around the Tian Shan record very young (

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available