4.6 Article

How sediment promotes narrow rifting: Application to the Gulf of California

Journal

TECTONICS
Volume 28, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2008TC002394

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NSF [EAR 04-09287]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

If the gravitational stress changes related to crustal thinning are large enough to affect the mode of extension, then sedimentation should also affect that mode. We propose that the weight of sediments reduces the difference in crustal buoyancy forces caused by local crustal thinning, allowing a rift to extend more easily in a narrow rift mode. We examine the effect of deposition of large amounts of nonlocally derived sediment on extensional style using two-dimensional, regional-scale numerical experiments of extending thick continental crust with varied initial thermal conditions, geometries, rheological parameters, and sedimentation properties. Depending on initial model conditions, the onset of rifting in thick continental crust occurs in the narrow rifting, wide rifting, or core complex mode. With continued extension, all cases eventually transition to a narrow rifting mode. For a system in wide rift mode, moderate to fast sedimentation shortens the time needed to transition to a narrow rift. In the Gulf of California, changes in extensional style correlate with sediment thickness, with an earlier transition to narrow rifting in the north versus the south. We compare our model results to the extensional history of the Gulf of California, where sediments may have caused the northern and north central domain of the gulf (Delfin-Tiburon and Guaymas segments) to transition to narrow rifting before the south central domains (Alarcon segment). Citation: Bialas, R. W., and W. R. Buck ( 2009), How sediment promotes narrow rifting: Application to the Gulf of California, Tectonics, 28, TC4014, doi:10.1029/2008TC002394.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available