4.6 Article

Fuzzy front-end learning strategies: Exploration of a high-tech company

Journal

TECHNOVATION
Volume 34, Issue 8, Pages 431-440

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2013.12.006

Keywords

New product and service development; Fuzzy front end; Uncertainty; Organizational learning; Learning strategies; Learning actions

Funding

  1. ST Microelectronic

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article investigates the upstream and usually hidden stages of new product/service development projects and aims to provide a set of learning actions that contribute to the reduction in fuzziness during early development stages. Because the fuzzy front end involves high levels of uncertainty, this article first analyzes the dimensions of fuzziness and then describes two in-depth case studies. The rich and contrasted insights into one success and one failure of a high-tech company identify how managers can use learning strategies to reduce fuzziness. Qualitative investigations based on interviews with managers and team members responsible for development projects reveal how the choice of specific learning strategies can address one or all three dimensions of fuzziness. By contrasting successes and failures, the study reveals how specific learning strategies can lead to an efficient reduction in fuzziness during the early stages of development. We identified broad sets of actions, including competencies recruitment, use of guiding visions, use of personal networks to find appropriate solutions, and processes that help connect client expectations with firm solutions. The detailed description of adopted means outlines how managers can succeed in the early stages of development by mastering organizational learning tools. (C) 2014 The Author. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-SA license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available