4.5 Article

A Bayesian Approach for Interpreting Mean Shifts in Multivariate Quality Control

Journal

TECHNOMETRICS
Volume 54, Issue 3, Pages 294-307

Publisher

AMER STATISTICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1080/00401706.2012.694789

Keywords

Fault isolation; Gibbs sampling; Hierarchical Bayes; Interpretation of out-of-control signal; Multivariate statistical process control; Variable selection

Funding

  1. NSF [DMS0705261, DMS1007574, CMMI-0927574]
  2. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  3. Division Of Mathematical Sciences [1007574] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  4. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn
  5. Directorate For Engineering [0927574] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Multivariate quality characteristics are often monitored using a single statistic or a few statistics. However, it is difficult to determine the causes of an out-of-control signal based on a few summary statistics. Therefore, if a control chart for the mean detects a change in the mean, the quality engineer needs to determine which means shifted and the directions of the shifts to facilitate identification of root causes. We propose a Bayesian approach that gives a direct answer to this question. For each mean, an indicator variable that indicates whether the mean shifted upward, shifted downward, or remained unchanged is introduced. Prior distributions for the means and indicators capture prior knowledge about mean shifts and allow for asymmetry in upward and downward shifts. The mode of the posterior distribution of the vector of indicators or the mode of the marginal posterior distribution of each indicator gives the most likely scenario for each mean. Evaluation of the posterior probabilities of all possible values of the indicators is avoided by employing Gibbs sampling. This renders the computational cost more affordable for high-dimensional problems. This article has supplementary materials online.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available