4.3 Article

Focusing on the Environment to Improve Youth Participation: Experiences and Perspectives of Occupational Therapists

Journal

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph121013388

Keywords

participation; leisure activities; environment barriers; intervention; childhood disability; adolescence; occupational therapy

Funding

  1. Ontario Federation for Cerebral Palsy
  2. Reseau Provincial de Recherche en Adaptation-Readaptation (REPAR)
  3. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The environment plays a key role in supporting children's participation and can serve as a focus of intervention. This study aimed to elicit the perceptions and experiences of occupational therapists who had applied the PREP approachPathways and Resources for Engagement and Participation. PREP is a novel 12-week intervention for youth with physical disabilities, aimed at improving participation in leisure community-based activities by modifying aspects of the environment. Using a qualitative post-intervention only design, 12 therapists took part in individual semi-structured interviews, in which the therapists reflected on their experience using PREP to enable participation. A thematic analysis was conducted. Four themes emerged from the data; two of which were informative in nature, describing elements of the PREP intervention that target multi-layered composition of the environment and use strategies that involve leveraging resources and problem solving. The two remaining themes were reflective in nature, illustrating a new take on the Occupational Therapy role and re-positioning the concept of participation in therapy practices. Results emphasize aspects of the environment that can serve as effective targets of intervention, guided by the PREP approach. Findings can broaden the scope and focus of occupational therapy practice by redefining views on participation and the environment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available