4.7 Article

Determination of trace amounts of Se(IV) by hydride generation atomic fluorescence spectrometry after solid-phase extraction using magnetic multi-walled carbon nanotubes

Journal

TALANTA
Volume 112, Issue -, Pages 123-128

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2013.03.014

Keywords

Fe3O4; Multi-wall carbon nanotubes; Solid-phase extraction; Hydride generation atomic fluorescence spectrometry; Se(IV)

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21205103, 21275124]
  2. Jiangsu Provincial Nature Foundation of China [BK2012258]
  3. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A sensitive and simple method using magnetic multi-walled carbon nanotubes, as an adsorbent, has been successfully developed for extraction and preconcentration trace amounts of Se(IV) with detection by hydride generation atomic fluorescence spectrometry. The prepared nanoparticles were confirmed by Fourier transform infrared spectra, X-ray diffraction spectrometry, vibrating sample magnetometry, and transmission electron microscopy. These magnetic nanocomposites can be easily dispersed in aqueous samples and retrieved by the application of external magnetic field via a piece of permanent magnet, The main factors affecting the signal intensity such as sample pH value, adsorbent amount, eluent concentration and volume, sample volume, and coexisting ions have been investigated and established. The absorbent could be repeatedly used at least 100 times. The enhancement factor of the proposed method for Se(IV) was 100. The method had a linear calibration plot in the range from 0.05 to 10.0 mu g L-1 with a standard deviation of 23% at 0.5 mu g L-1 (n=11). The limit of detection was as low as 0.013 mu g Accuracy of the method was evaluated by the analysis of water samples and certified reference materials. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available