4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Measurements of arsenite and arsenate contained in mining river waters and leached from contaminated sediments by sequential hydride generation flow injection analysis

Journal

TALANTA
Volume 84, Issue 5, Pages 1336-1341

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2011.02.042

Keywords

Arsenite; Arsenate; Water analysis; Leaching of arsenic from sediments; Kinetics of leaching; Sequential hydride generation flow injection analysis

Funding

  1. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [21550087] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this work, a new analytical method for gasifiable compounds based on sequential hydride generation flow injection analysis (SHGFIA) was applied to water analysis and leaching investigation. For water analysis, it was confirmed that 1 mu g L-1 As(III) and As(V) were stable for a few days when EDTA was added in the sample waters. Dissolved As(III) and total arsenic (As(III)+As(V)) were converted to AsH3 in neutral and acidic medium, respectively, to transfer to a miniature gas scrubber (100 mu L in absorber volume). The collected arsenic was successively measured by flow analysis based on molybdenum blue chemistry. With this system, changes in As(III) and As(V) concentrations of water placed with arsenic-contaminated-sediment was monitored in near real time. From these data, kinetic analyses were carried out and kinetic constant was obtained from plot of In {(C-infinity - C)/C-infinity} where C and C-infinity were leached arsenic concentration and its final concentration, respectively. It was found that rate of As(III) leaching was much faster than that of As(V) while As(V) leached more in amount compared to As(III). In this work, it was demonstrated that kinetic investigation is also one of the important application of flow analysis. The SHGFIA system showed excellent performance for leaching analysis of arsenic with discrimination of As(III) and As(V). (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available