4.7 Article

Using sweeping-micellar electrokinetic chromatography to determine voriconazole in patient plasma

Journal

TALANTA
Volume 82, Issue 2, Pages 653-659

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2010.05.027

Keywords

Voriconazole; SPE; Sweeping-MEKC; Plasma

Funding

  1. National Science Council of Taiwan [NSC 98-2320-B-002-022]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Invasive fungal infection is a life-threatening condition; its occurrence has increased significantly over the past 20 years. We have developed a sensitive and efficient sweeping-micellar electrokinetic chromatography (sweeping-MEKC) method to quantify voriconazole, a potent triazole antifungal drug, in patient plasma. Solid phase extraction (SPE) conditions were first optimized to minimize plasma interference while maintaining a high recovery; the sweeping-MEKC conditions were then systematically optimized to obtain a high sweeping efficiency with good selectivity. Under the optimal analytical conditions, voriconazole was baseline-separated from endogenous materials within 10.5 min with a limit of detection of 0.075 mu g mL(-1). The background electrolyte comprised 40 mM phosphoric acid, 110 mM sodium dodecyl sulfate, and 20% acetonitrile. In terms of method repeatability, the relative standard deviations (RSDs) of the migration time and the peak area (intra-day; n = 6) were both less than 5.5%; in terms of intermediate precision, and the RSDs of the peak area and the migration time (inter-day; n = 3) were both less than 6.3%. We successfully applied this developed method to the quantitative determination of plasma voriconazole levels in 16 patients; the results correlated well with those obtained through analyses using high-performance liquid chromatography. This sweeping-MEKC method is accurate and efficient and appears to be applicable to therapeutic drug monitoring and clinical research. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available