4.7 Article

Fast throughput, highly sensitive determination of allergenic disperse dyes in textile products by use of sample composition

Journal

TALANTA
Volume 82, Issue 1, Pages 261-269

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2010.04.031

Keywords

Disperse dyes; LC-MS; Sample composition

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation
  2. FEDER [CTQ2009-08377]
  3. Spanish Ministry of Education

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A simple, highly sensitive and fast procedure for the control of allergenic disperse dyes in textile products was optimized. The method is based on ultrasound assisted extraction of textile samples with 20 mL of methanol under controlled conditions (15 min, 70 degrees C) followed by separation and analysis by LC-MS-MS. The sample preparation process was optimized by means of a surface response experimental design and provided quantitative recoveries of dyes, much better than the poor recoveries provided by current standard procedures. The chromatographic separation was optimized by means of computer-assisted method development by use of a special chemometric tool developed specifically for LC-MS systems, as previously reported by the authors. The result is a rapid chromatographic procedure that enables accurate quantification, at very low concentrations, of all 23 allergenic and/or carcinogenic disperse dyes considered. Matrix effects in the LC-MS procedure were studied. Under the experimental conditions, both conventional and strategic sample composition are proposed as efficient procedures that reduce the costs and work involved in the control of allergenic dyes in finished textile products. The benefits of strategic sample composition are demonstrated by means of an example case study, and the pros and cons of preparing the composite samples from sample extracts or directly from textile products are discussed. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available