4.7 Article

Pseudo-homogeneous immunoextraction of epitestosterone from human urine samples based on gold-coated magnetic nanoparticles

Journal

TALANTA
Volume 81, Issue 3, Pages 819-823

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2010.01.021

Keywords

Pseudo-homogeneous immunoreaction; Half-IgG; Epitestosterone; Gold-coated magnetic nanoparticles; High-performance liquid chromatography

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [90713013, 30890142]
  2. MOST, China [2006BAF07B03, 2009CB320305]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A pseudo-homogeneous immunoextraction method based on gold-coated magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) for the specific extraction and quantitative analysis of epitestosterone (17 alpha-hydroxy-4-androsten-3-one, abbreviated as ET) from human urine samples by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) has been developed. Half-IgG of anti-ET monoclonal antibodies were covalently immobilized onto (Fe3O4)(core-)Au-shell (Fe3O4@Au) MNPs. An external magnetic field was applied to collect the MNPs which were then rinsed with distilled water followed by elution with absolute methanol to obtain ET as the analyte. The obtained extraction solution was analyzed by HPLC with UV detection (244 nm) within 12 min. The standard calibration curve for ET showed good linearity in the range of 20-200 ng mL(-1) in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) solutions with acceptable accuracy and precision. Limit of detection for ET was 0.06 ng mL(-1) due to an enrichment factor of 100-fold was achieved. The results obtained by the present method for spiked human urine samples were in agreement with those from indirect competitive enzyme-linked immunoadsorbent assays (ELISAs). The antibody-conjugated Fe3O4@Au MNPs are novel materials for immunoaffinity extraction. Compared with the conventional technique using immunoaffinity column, the method described here for sample pretreatment was fast, highly specific, and easy to operate. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available