4.7 Article

Partial least squares X-ray fluorescence determination of trace elements in sediments from the estuary of Nerbioi-Ibaizabal River

Journal

TALANTA
Volume 82, Issue 4, Pages 1254-1260

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2010.06.047

Keywords

Partial least squares; X-ray fluorescence; Estuarine sediments; Metals; Trace elements

Funding

  1. BERRILUR 3 Strategic Research Project [IE09-242]
  2. Ministerio de Educacion y Ciencia [AGL2007-64567, CTQ2008-05719/BQU]
  3. UPV/EHU

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The feasibility of partial least squares (PLS) regression modeling of X-ray fluorescence (XRF) spectra of estuarine sediments has been evaluated as a tool for rapid trace element content monitoring. Multivariate PLS calibration models were developed to predict the concentration of Al, As, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, Mg, Mn, Ni, Pb, Sn, V and Zn in sediments collected from different locations across the estuary of the Nerbioi-Ibaizabal River (Metropolitan Bilbao, Bay of Biscay, Basque Country). The study was carried out on a set of 116 sediment samples, previously lyophilized and sieved with a particle size lower than 63 mu m. Sample reference data were obtained by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. 34 samples were selected for building PLS models through a hierarchical cluster analysis. The remaining 82 samples were used as a test set to validate the models. Results obtained in the present study involved relative root mean square errors of prediction varying from 21%, for the determination of Pb at hundreds mu g g(-1) level, up to 87%, for Ni determination at little tens mu g g(-1) level. An average prediction error of +/- 37% for the 14 elements under study was obtained, being in all cases mean differences between predicted and reference results of the same order than the standard deviation of three replicates from a same sample. Residual predictive deviation values obtained ranged from 1.1 to 3.9. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available